Ecopost: Eco-critical discourse analysis of wwf-Philippines’ captions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71028/jescs.v2i3.132Keywords:
WWF-Philippines, eco-friendly language, eco-linguistic features, eco-critical discourse analysis, ecosophyAbstract
This study explores the eco-critical discourse analysis of eco-friendly language used in the 2024 captions posted by WWF-Philippines on Facebook. It aims to examine how ecolinguistic features such as metaphors, narratives, persuasive language, and intertextuality are employed to promote environmental awareness and sustainability. Through a qualitative descriptive approach and using criterion sampling, 38 selected captions were analysed to categorize ecological discourse as eco-beneficial, eco-ambivalent, or eco-destructive. The study also investigates how these discourses reflect the WWF-Philippines’ ecosophy, emphasizing interconnectedness, care for living beings, and environmental justice. Results reveal that metaphors and persuasive language are the most prominent features used to inspire environmental consciousness. Most captions conveyed eco-beneficial discourse, encouraging collective responsibility, emotional engagement, and positive environmental actions. Findings highlight the importance of strategic language use in fostering environmental advocacy on digital platforms. The study contributes to the growing field of ecolinguistics by providing insights into the role of language in shaping ecological awareness and promoting sustainable behaviours through social media communication. This study shows how language can be a powerful tool for promoting social media action and raising environmental awareness.
Downloads
References
Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic journal of English studies, 9(2), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215
Akamani, K. (2020). Integrating deep ecology and adaptive governance for sustainable development: Implications for protected areas management. Sustainability, 12(14), 5757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145757
Alexander, R., & Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language sciences, 41, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011
Anyango-van Zwieten, N., Lamers, M., & van der Duim, R. (2019). Funding for nature conservation: a study of public finance networks at World Wide Fund for nature (WWF). Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(14), 3749-3766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01848-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01848-y
Aslan, E. U., & Bas, B. (2020). Ecocritical Approach to Children's Literature: Example of" I Am a Hornbeam Branch". Educational Research and Reviews, 15(12), 711-720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2020.4063
Barbulet, G. (2013). Social media- a pragmatic approach: contexts & implicatures. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,83,422-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.083
Bigler, R. S., & Leaper, C. (2015). Gendered language: Psychological principles, evolving practices, and inclusive policies. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600452
Bruder, J., & Bouherar, S. (2023). Language research on sustainability, ecology, and pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1218961.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1218961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1218961
Campagna, C., & Fernandez, T. (2007). A comparative analysis of the vision and mission statements of international environmental organisations. Environmental Values, 16(3), 369-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327107X228409
Cavalante, K. L., & Alves, R. S. (2020). Ecosophy and Relationship Between Man and Nature In Contemporaneity. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS), 7, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.71.23
Cheng, M. (2022). Theoretical framework for ecological discourse analysis: A summary of New Developments of Ecological Discourse Analysis. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 188-226.
Cheng, M. (2022). Theoretical framework for ecological discourse analysis: A summary of New Developments of Ecological Discourse Analysis. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 188-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0030
Curren,R. (2011). Environmental Sustainability. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_264
Dogruer, N., Menevi, I., & Eyyam, R. (2011). What is the motivation for using Facebook? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2642-2646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.162
Ekasiwi, A. N., & Bram, B. (2023). Ecolinguistic topics in Indonesian English textbooks. Interference: Journal of Language, Literature, and Linguistics, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.26858/interference.v4i1.42935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/interference.v4i1.42935
Felleisen, M., Findler, R. B., Flatt, M., Krishnamurthi, S., Barzilay, E., McCarthy, J., & Tobin-Hochstadt, S. (2018). A programmable programming language. Communications of the ACM, 61(3), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3127323
Finlayson, C. (2018). World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). In The wetland book I: Structure and function, management and methods (pp. 727-731). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_139
Furduesco, B. A. (2019). NLP tools and processes of motivation. HOLISTICA–Journal of Business and Public Administration, 10(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2019-0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2019-0014
Halliday, M. A. (2003). On the language of physical science. In Writing science (pp. 59-75). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203209936
Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. In Anwar S. Dil (ed.), The ecology of language: Essays by Einar Haugen, 325–339. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
He, W., & Wei, R. (2018). The paradigm of discourse analyses and the theoretical foundation of ecological discourse analysis. Dangdai Xiucixue, 5, 63-73.
Huang Guowen, Chen Yang (2016) Ecosophy and Ecological Analysis of Discourse. Foreign Language and Literature 32(6): 55-61
Ilyas, S., & Khushi, Q. (2012). Facebook status updates: A speech act analysis. Academic research international, 3(2), 500-507.
Ivchenko, N. (2021). Comic Function in the Animated Ecodiscourse (Case Study of" Zootopia"). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(9), 1080-1086. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1109.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1109.14
Jordán-Conde, Z., Mennecke, B., & Townsend, A. (2014). Late adolescent identity definition and intimate disclosure on Facebook. Computers in human behavior, 33, 356-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.015
Kang, L. (2014). South Korea's sustainable urban planning and environmental technology. Discussions, 10(1).
Khasandi-Telewa, V. (2023). An ecolinguistic reading of Luhya oral narratives in Kenya: The ecofeminism and ecocentrism ecosophies. Language and Ecology.
Lagasca-Hiloma, C. M., Bate, J., & Lagasca, K. F. A. (2021). The Effectiveness of WWF-Philippines' Manual on Waste Management in Promoting Positive Environmental Behaviors Among Filipino 5 th and 6 th Graders. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 21(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1384
Mallinson, C. (2017). Language and its everyday revolutionary potential. The Oxford handbook of US women's social movement activism, 419. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190204204.013.38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190204204.013.38
Martinez-Conde, S., et al., (2019). The Storytelling Brain: How Neuroscience Stories Help Bridge the Gap Between Research and Society. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 39(42), 8285–8290. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1180-19.2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1180-19.2019
Naess, A. (1987). Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. The Trumpeter, 4(3)
Naess, A. (1989). From ecology to ecosophy, from science to wisdom. World Futures: Journal of General Evolution, 27(2-4), 185-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.1989.9972135
Naess, A. (1995). The shallow and the long range, deep ecology movement. In Drengson, A. & Inoue, Y. (eds). The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Open Air Philosophy, (2023). Arne Naess - Open Air Philosophy. Open Air Philosophy. https://openairphilosophy.org/arne-naess/
Pretty, J., Adams, B., Berkes, F., De Athayde, S. F., Dudley, N., Hunn, E., ... & Pilgrim, S. (2009). The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: towards integration. Conservation and Society, 7(2), 100-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.58642
Ramos, C. C. R. Environmental Philosophy and Environmental Education in the Philippines as Life Learning Tools.
Stanlaw, J. (2020). Ecolinguistics. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0110
Stapleton, A., McHugh, L., & Karekla, M. (2022). How to Effectively Promote Eco-Friendly Behaviors: Insights from Contextual Behavioral Science. Sustainability, 14(21), 13887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113887
Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: the state of the art and future horizons. Language sciences, 41, 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
Stibbe, A. (2015a). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by (1st ed.). Routledge.
Stibbe, A. (2015b). Ecolinguistic Discourse Analysis. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction.1–5. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi013
Sultan, A. (2021). Language of Persuasion: Analyzing language of digital discourse (With special reference to the Egyptian Presidential Digital Awareness Campaign of Live Green). مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب, 22(7), 126-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jssa.2021.97431.1313
Tajane, D. S. S. (2024). Ecocriticism in literature: Examining nature and the environment in literary works. Educational Administration: Theory And Practice, 30 (6), 2162-2168. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5675
Tardy, C. M., & Swales, J. M. (2011). Genre analysis. Continuum companion to discourse analysis, 54-68.
Triyono, S., Sahayu, W., & Fath, S. N. (2023). Ecological Discourse and Environmental Education in English Textbooks: A Multimodal Eco-Critical Discourse Analysis. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(3).
Triyono, S., Sahayu, W., & Fath, S. N. (2023). Ecological Discourse and Environmental Education in English Textbooks: A Multimodal Eco-Critical Discourse Analysis. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2903-15
UNEP (n.d). World Wide Fund for Nature. https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/oceans-seas/what-we-do/working-regional-seas/partners/world-wide-fund-nature-wwf
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 466-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
Wenden, A. L. (2003). Achieving a comprehensive peace: the linguistic factor. Peace & Change, 28(2), 169-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0130.00258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0130.00258
Wu, Y. (2018, September). Ecological discourse analysis. In 2018 4th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2018). Atlantis Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-18.2018.163
Zapf, H. (2006). Literature and ecology: introductory remarks on a new paradigm of literary studies. https://doi.org/10.1515/ANGL.2006.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ANGL.2006.1
Zhang, B., Chandran Sandaran, S., & Feng, J. (2023). The ecological discourse analysis of news discourse based on deep learning from the perspective of ecological philosophy. PloS one, 18(1), e0280190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280190
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jhoan Cristine R. Fernando, Rodolfo P. Dizon Jr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
(c) by Author(s)
