Analysis of asymmetrical communication in teacher-student interaction: A case study in Indonesian educational settings
Keywords:
asymmetrical communication, asymmetriteacher-student interaction, Indonesian educational settings, terms of address, power dynamicsAbstract
Indonesian educational settings feature a distinct form of linguistic asymmetry. Students utilize terms of respect ("Bapak", "Ibu") to address teachers, while teachers employ the informal "kamu" when referring to students. This disparity, embedded in everyday communication, contributes significantly to shaping the classroom environment and power dynamics.This study aims to explore and analyse the implications of such asymmetrical communication on the overall classroom interaction. Data for this study were gathered through a comprehensive qualitative approach involving classroom observations, audio recordings of teacher-student interactions, and field notes. The analysis revealed distinct patterns in the asymmetrical communication between teachers and students. Students consistently used formal terms of address, reflecting a cultural emphasis on respect for authority figures. Conversely, teachers employed the more informal term "kamu" when addressing students, possibly reflecting a desire to establish a friendlier rapport. The asymmetry was found to influence power dynamics within the classroom, affecting student participation, engagement, and the overall learning atmosphere. Additionally, non-verbal cues, such as body language and tone of voice, played a significant role in shaping the communication dynamics. The study highlights the complex interplay between language, culture, and power dynamics in teacher-student communication within Indonesian educational settings. The observed asymmetry, while rooted in cultural norms, has implications for the overall classroom climate and student-teacher relationships.
Downloads
References
Al-Khawaldeh, N.N.; Olimat, S.N.; Mashaqba, B.M.; Al-Omari, M.A.; Alkhawaldeh, A.A. (2023). Normativity and Variation in the Address Terms System Practiced among the Jordanian Youth Community. Languages 8,31. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010031
Al-Qudah, Mahmoud. (2017). The Jordanian terms of address: Asocio-pragmatic study. SHS Web of Conference, Vol. 37.
Alharbi, T. A. (2015). A Socio-pragmatic Study of Forms of Address and Terms of Reference in Classical Arabic as Represented in the Chapter of Joseph in the Holy Quran (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Leeds, United Kingdom). Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/11127/. Accessed on 17 June 2019.
Amelia, Y., & Ekawati, R. (2021). The Use Of Address Terms In Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them Movie. CaLLs: Journal of Culture, Arts, Literature, and Linguistics, 7(2), 131- 144. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/calls.v7i2.5444
Awoonor-Aziaku, L. (2021). Address Terms in Classroom Discourse: A Case of University of Cape Coast Students in Ghana. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11, 497-510.
Braun, F. (1988). Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin, German: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gusdian, R. I. (2016). Penggunaan kata sapaan oleh pembawa acara Apa Kabar Indonesia (AKI) di TV One. Kembara, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.212-215.
Brown, R, and Gilman A. (1960). “The pronouns of power and solidarity,” In: Fishman JA, editor. Readings in the Sociology of Language. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. (1960) p. 252–75.
Erni. (2016). The Use of Address Forms and Politeness in Intercultural Communication. The Indonesian Journal of Language and Language Teaching, pp. 53–62.
Havu, E. (2015). Forms of Address.
Iragiliati, E. (2012). Doctor-Patient Communication and Preferred Terms Of Address: Respect and Kinship System (A Pragmatic Study). Makara Human Behaviour Studies in Asia, 16(1), 9- 18. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v16i1.1124
Iriyansah, M. (2017). Sistem Sapaan Kerabat Keraton Surakarta Hadiningrat. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.25134/fjpbsi.v11i2.719
Parkinson, J. (2020). On the use of the address terms guys and mate in an educational context. Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 161, Pages 81-94,
Karifianto, D. M. (2021). Address Terms Used By Australians: A Case Study Of Melbourne. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 2(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v2i01.97
Kusumaningsih, D. (2015). Pemilihan bentuk sapaan kekerabatan sebagai strategi kesantunan berbahasa dalam interaksi di lingkungan kampus. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Prasasti II, pp.507-511.
Mohammad, H. (2001). The role of social context, intimacy, and distance in the choice of forms of address. International Journal of Sociology of Language, Vol. 2001, Issue 148, pp.5-18.
Nose, M. (2021). Persons and Address Terms in Melanesia.
Olliver, J., Nißen, M., and von Wangenheim, F. (2021). The Terms of “You(s)”: How the Term of Address Used by Conversational Agents Influences User Evaluations in French and German Linguaculture. Front. Public Health, Sec. Digital Public Health, Volume 9.
Özcan, F. H. (2016). Choice of address terms in conversational setting. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 982–1002. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3489.
Rahman, A. (2014). Terms of Address Used by Students of English Courses in Kampong Inggris Pare, Kediri. LANGUAGE HORIZON, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.26740/lh.v2n1.p%p.
Saeedeh, E. (2011). Term of Address Usage: the Case of Iranian Spouses. Retrived from: http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol._1_No._9_Issu_Jully_2011/20.pdf. 1,(9), 183-188.
Schupbach, D., Hajek J., Warren J., Clyne, M., Kretzenbacher, H-L., Norrby, C. (2007). “A cross-linguistic comparison of address pronoun use in four European languages: intralingual and interlingual dimensions,” In: Selected Papers from the 2006 Annual meeting of the Australian Linguistic Society. School of English, Media and Art History, University of Queensland. (2007)
Situmorang, K. (2018). Indonesian Students’ Acquisition of English Address Terms: A Case Study in a University in the United Kingdom. Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|, 2(2), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v2i2.4970.
Surono. (2018). “Address Terms Across Cultures: A Sociopragmatic Analysis,” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, pp. 316–324.
Wibowo, R. M., & Retnaningsih, A. (2015). Dinamika bentuk-bentuk sapaan sebagai refleksi sikap berbahasa masyarakat Indonesia. Humaniora, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.269-282.
Wierzbicka A. (2016). Terms of address in European languages: a study in cross-linguistic semantics and pragmatics,” In: Allan K, Capone A, Kecskes I, editors. Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 209–38.
Wierzbicka, A. (2017). Terms of Address in European Languages: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Semantics and Pragmatics. 10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_12.
Allan K, Capone A, Kecskes I, editors. (201&). Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 209–38.
Williams, L., and van Compernolle, RA. (2007). On versus tu and vous: Pronouns with indefinite reference in synchronous electronic French discourse. Lang Sci. (2009) 31:409–27. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.11.001
Zakiyah, M. (2018). Makna sapaan di pesantren: Kajian linguistic antropologis. Leksema, Vol. 3, No.1, pp.11-22.
Zavitri, I., H. Mahmoed, and Sukmawati, (2018). “The Address Terms in English and Selayerese: A Sociolinguistic Perspective,” Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, pp. 129–134.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-09-30 (5)
- 2024-02-03 (4)
- 2024-01-23 (3)
- 2024-01-20 (2)
- 2024-01-15 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
(c) by Author(s)
