Semiotic analysis of zero waste campaigns on instagram

Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71028/jescs.v3i3.167

Kata Kunci:

semiotics, environmental communication, zero waste, social media, visual communication

Abstrak

This study examines the symbolic construction of environmental messages in a zero waste campaign post published by Zero Waste Indonesia on Instagram dated March 12, 2026. The objective of this research is to analyze how meaning is produced and communicated through visual and textual elements in social media-based environmental campaigns. This study employs a qualitative research approach using semiotic analysis based on Roland Barthes’ framework, focusing on three levels of meaning: denotation, connotation, and myth.The findings reveal that the analyzed content operates as a complex system of signs that constructs environmental meaning beyond its literal representation. At the denotative level, the post depicts the reality of waste accumulation and its management. At the connotative level, the content frames waste as a serious and potentially hazardous issue while highlighting the social dimension of environmental problems. At the level of myth, the message constructs an ideological narrative emphasizing collective responsibility, positioning audiences as both contributors to environmental degradation and agents of change. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that social media functions as a powerful platform for environmental communication by integrating visual storytelling and persuasive messaging. The findings suggest that zero waste campaign content not only informs but also influences audience perceptions, moral awareness, and attitudes toward sustainable behavior.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Anderson, A. (2022). Media, environment and the network society. Palgrave Macmillan.

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-94154-0

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. Fontana Press.

https://monoskop.org/images/7/7e/Barthes_Roland_Image_Music_Text.pdf

Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). Routledge.

https://www.routledge.com/Semiotics-The-Basics/Chandler/p/book/9781138234149

Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/environmental-communication-and-the-public-sphere/book235513

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book235675

Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2021). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–12.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984459

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Theories of human communication (10th ed.). Waveland Press.

https://www.waveland.com/browse.php?t=384

Nabi, R. L., Gustafson, A., & Jensen, R. (2022). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Communication Research, 49(3), 442–468.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211037475

Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media sosial: Perspektif komunikasi, budaya, dan sosioteknologi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nasrullah+Media+Sosial+2015

O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2021). Fear won’t do it: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual communication. Science Communication, 43(1), 1–28.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971911

UNEP. (2021). From pollution to solution: A global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. United Nations Environment Programme.

https://www.unep.org/resources/report/pollution-solution-global-assessment-marine-litter-and-plastic-pollution

Veltri, G. A., & Atanasova, D. (2021). Climate change on social media: Content, engagement, and influence. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(1), e665.

https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665

Wang, X., Zhao, K., & Chen, Y. (2023). The impact of social media environmental campaigns on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Communication, 17(2), 215–230.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2031403

World Bank. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications.

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30317

Diterbitkan

2026-06-22

Cara Mengutip

Afifah, S., & Putri, K. Y. S. (2026). Semiotic analysis of zero waste campaigns on instagram . Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 3(3), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.71028/jescs.v3i3.167

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles