Critical discourse analysis of Martin Luther's speech

Authors

  • Zeeshan Ali The University of Lahore, PAKISTAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58881/jescs.v1i2.12

Keywords:

socio-political context, power dynamics, rhetoric, linguistics strategies, transitivity

Abstract

This study aims to critically examine Martin Luther’s speech through the lens of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), focusing on the interaction between language and societal factors such as race, social class, and identity. By analyse the speech at the word, text, social, and discursive levels, this research seeks to uncover the ways in which Luther’s rhetoric reflects and influences the socio-political context of his time. The study employs a descriptive and qualitative methodology, utilizing historical transcripts as the primary data source. At the micro-level, the analysis emphasizes lexical features and transitivity, while the macro-level analysis explores grammatical, social, ideological, and discursive characteristics. The findings reveal that Luther’s strategic use of language not only challenged the dominant ideologies of his era but also played a significant role in shaping the Reformation movement. The study concludes that Luther’s speech serves as a powerful example of how discourse can be used to both reflect and enact social change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amandari, N. P. M., Netra, I. M., & Suwari, N. M. (2024). Critical discourse analysis on BTS commencement speech in dear class of 2020. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 1(2), 70–76. Retrieved from https://ojs.ptmjb.com/index.php/JESCS/article/view/11 (Original work published April 26, 2024)

Antari, N. K. D. (2022). An Analysis of the Interpersonal Meaning of Lyric and Video “zombie” by Day6. JLPS 2022, 1, 16-24.

Dewi, L. G. A. K. S. (2023). Lexical and grammatical cohesion analysis in “clouds” song lyrics. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 24–31. Retrieved from https://ympn.co.id/index.php/JLLSCS/article/view/22 (Original work published January 27, 2023).

Dewi, N. M. S. C. (2023). Lexical and grammatical cohesion analysis of “nothing like us” song lyrics: written discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 2(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v2i1.9 (Original work published March 31, 2023)

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of language. London: Longman.

Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Trans. by Burger T. with the Assistance of Lawrence F.). Polity Press, Cambridge, 161.

Hamdi, S. (2023). Cohesion in Ali Douagi’s sleepless nights and Shirley Jackson’s the lottery: A comparative study. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 1(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v1i3.97.

Hogg, R. (1992). The Cambridge history of the English Language: Volume 1. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Ilahi, A. (2024). Begum Rokeya to Arundhati Roy: An intangible dream of woman emancipation. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v2i1.140.

Joser, J. R., Dedace, J. R., Daclizon, K., Salvaña, P. L., Nacionales, J., & Claridad, N. (2023). The rhetoric of comedy: exploring the language and humor styles of Filipino stand-up comedians. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 2(2), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v2i2.17.

McGrath, A.E. (2001). A Scientific Theology: Volume 1 (Nature). xx + 325 pp., bibl., index. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Mekt, Y., Getahun, A., & Meseret, T. (2024). A critical discourse analysis (CDA) of a political speech of Mr. Christian Tadele speech in the parliament . Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 1(2), 56–62. Retrieved from https://ojs.ptmjb.com/index.php/JESCS/article/view/16 (Original work published April 26, 2024).

Miller, James B. (2005). Alister E. McGrath. A Scientific Theology: Volume 1. xx + 325 pp., bibl., index. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2001. $40. Isis 96 (1):157-158.

Mustafa, M., & Muhammad, L. A. (2023). Discourse towards understanding the impacts of humour in foreign language classes. Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 1(3), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.58881/jllscs.v1i3.99 (Original work published September 1, 2023).

Teja, N. S., Utami, N. M. V., & Juniartha, I. W. (2022). Uncover the meaning of figurative language in the selected songs. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 1(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v1i1.5

van Dijk, T.A. (1998) Ideology. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Editorial: Discourse and Ideology. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 307-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003001.

Wajdi, M., & Asrumi, A. (2024). Analysing the slogan "LUBER" in Indonesia’s 2024 general election: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 3(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v3i1.39.

Wajdi, M., Adnyana, I. K. P., Dewi, K. A. T., Dewi, K. B. S., Arini, K. P., Artini, N. K., Prathivi, P. P. G. S., & Ariani, N. L. P. Y. (2023). The novel of “my idiot brother” by Agnes Danovar (book review). Journal of Language, Literature, Social and Cultural Studies, 1(1), 8–15. Retrieved from https://ympn.co.id/index.php/JLLSCS/article/view/24

Wendebourg, D. (2019). [Review of the book Martin Luther: Visionary Reformer, by Scott Hendrix]. Lutheran Quarterly 33(2), 197-201. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lut.2019.0022.

Wodak, R. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26 — Updated on 2024-08-12

Versions

How to Cite

Ali, Z. (2024). Critical discourse analysis of Martin Luther’s speech . Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 1(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.58881/jescs.v1i2.12 (Original work published April 26, 2024)